64°Overcast

Controversial Development Returning to Vienna Town Council

by Vernon Miles October 2, 2018 at 10:30 am 5 Comments

The application for a controversial redevelopment on Maple Avenue will be coming back to the Vienna Town Council later this week.

On paper, the rezoning application for 430, 440 and 444 Maple Ave. W. is a simple redevelopment issue, but over the last months the application has ignited questions about how Vienna adapts to a marketplace swiftly leaving it behind.

On Thursday, Oct. 4 at 7:30 p.m., project developer Vienna Development Associates LLC will return to the town hall for a work session to try to convince Vienna the project is right for Maple Avenue.

The site is currently occupied by the Vienna Wolf Trap Hotel, but the developer hopes to convince the Vienna Town Council to approve rezoning of the site to let them build a new four-story mixed use development. The project would have 160 multi-family residential units and 22,000 square feet of retail space.

The project attracted controversy in the community from the start, with 53 residents speaking mostly against the project at a July 9 public hearing on the project. The Vienna Town Council received 99 written comments by the time the comment period closed in August.

Many of these comments expressed concerns about the validity of traffic studies paid for by the developer. The traffic studies showed that the project would not have more of a traffic impact on Maple Avenue than any development not-requiring rezoning approval would have.

But public comments and emails to the council said citizens were still concerned the new development would add to the congestion at an already busy intersection and make traffic worse in close proximity to two nearby schools.

A third-party review initiated by Vienna Town Council staff verified the findings of the initial traffic studies, but Vienna Development Associates LLC deferred its application at the Aug. 20 Town Council meeting to take into account feedback from the council and from public comments.

Now, the developer has said the traffic concerns about the project have been addressed. Along with a series of project changes that the company says will reduce residential traffic by 25 percent, the developer has identified several transportation improvements that it hopes will make the project more palatable, including:

  • Extending turn lanes on the nearby Nutley Street and Maple Avenue
  • Widening the Maple Avenue exit to allow right and left turn lanes
  • Pedestrian and bus stop improvements
  • A shuttle running from the site to the Metro

But transportation concerns are only one part of the opposition to the project. For many who oppose the project, the development is too large and out of character for the small-town feel of Vienna.

“If we’re going to have a project there, this one is not ready for primetime,” said Councilmember Howard Springsteen at the August meeting. “I think the developer has done a horrible [public relations] job and has created a firestorm of concerns around town. This is probably one of the most divisive things that has come to this town in 20 years.”

In addition to traffic concerns, Springsteen said he and many Vienna residents were concerned that the building was too large and lacked substantial green space.

“People are upset about this around town,” said Springsteen. “Some are in favor, but the majority are opposed. This project needs to be reworked.”

But for others on the Vienna Town Council there are concerns that pushback on projects like the mixed-use development on Maple Avenue will lead to developers passing Vienna by. While residents are concerned about Vienna losing its unique small town character as more of its neighbors become rapidly urbanized, Maple Avenue is plagued with chronic vacancies.

Nearly every block on Maple Avenue has a vacancy of some kind. Traveling west on Maple Avenue, Vienna starts to look like a ghost town. Some whole blocks, like the former Marco Polo Restaurant at 245 Maple Ave., are completely abandoned and showing signs of overgrowth.

“Maple Avenue is a terrific location, but there are concerns with vacancies and commercial corridor perception,” said Councilmember Carey Sienicki. “Relying on the traditional model of neighborhoods separated from strip malls may no longer be justifiable to meet those needs. It’s important to see the benefits of mixed use options.”

Sienicki said that she believed that the additional height of the building won’t negatively impact the character of the town.

“There has been a citizen insurgency precipitated from what has happened in surrounding jurisdictions,” said Sienicki. “Town must react to those external concerns for Vienna. We are not looking to be like other jurisdictions. We are Vienna.”

Concept renderings via Vienna Development Associates LLC. Hotel photo via Vienna Wolf Trap Hotel.

  • keith sumner

    The development looks pretty nice to me. I understand the concerns about traffic, but preventing this development isn’t going to do anything to prevent traffic from getting worse. Vienna residents can’t control development outside Vienna which will continue to drive much of the traffic burden. Residents and the council should keep a sharp eye on the proposal and push back where necessary, but a certain subset of people are opposed to everything. Keep fighting everything and Maple avenue will be lined with by right self-storage and more banks and drug strores. Personally, I’m willing to take a chance to get rid of the s-hole that is the Wolf Trap Motel and the trash it attracts.

  • residentcynic

    The crazy part of this is that downtown Vienna, with the W&OD running through, is a PERFECT place for this kind of thing. It’s on a number of transit lines (bus to Metro admittedly, but this will always be the case outside of 1/4-1/2mi. from Metro stops) and has a number of small retail developments that mixed-use a very intriguing proposition.

    Maple Avenue should be trying to redevelop a la Broad (Rt 7) in Falls Church. They would be perfect complements.

  • Laura

    Broad Street in Falls Church is exactly what so many people in Vienna cite as what they don’t want. (The word “canyon” comes up a lot. Also “awful.”) Falls Church City has to fund its schools, so for them it may have been worth it.

  • Laura

    This building is very, very, very large. The footprint is the size of a football field, and the height is 61 feet. The tenants of the 160 apartments will not be able to reach I-66 or Metro easily, because they will not be able to turn south on Nutley Street and turning west on Maple will be close to impossible most times of day. The Town and the developer insist this will not result in cut-through traffic in the adjoining neighborhood! Unbelievable! Did I mention this building is huge?

  • Laura

    Perhaps you can teach yourself not to call people “trash.”

×

Subscribe to our mailing list